How the End Citizens United is Hoping to Change the Political System


Have you ever heard of the Citizens United landmark? If you live in the United States, you should, as it is one of the most critical political landmarks to understand what we are experiencing in the political scene.

The Citizens United landmark was created to advocate for freedom of speech and expression in a way that would directly impact the relationship between voters and their favorite candidates.

The Citizens United approved the use of financial assistance if you want to help fund the campaign of your favorite candidate. That means that anyway can send financial aid if they really want to be a part of the campaign of someone that they want to see changing the future of their nation.

The problem came after the approval of the landmark. No one noticed that the biggest donors would be business owners and magnates, not individual citizens wanting to fund the candidates that they believe in. In a few months of activation, the political world was already teeming with billionaires financing the politicians that they felt would be beneficial for their corporative interests.

This is why the End Citizens United group was created. It was founded by people that wanted to see the landmark revised and changed. The United States is suffering from the lack of transparency and honesty in the political system, and this landmark was the biggest offender since its approval in 2010.

The End Citizens United raises awareness and gathers members and grassroots donors to make a difference. They are consistently using the broken system of the Citizens United political scene to prove that it is inhabitable and a receipt for failure in the future.

They also support Democrat candidates, and this time they have announced their support for Mikie Sherill, a former U.S. Navy pilot, and federal prosecutor.

End Citizens United Announces Support for Pilot That Can Swoosh Away The ‘Earmuffs Made of Special Interest Money’

End Citizen’s United President Tiffany Muller has said that there are too many members of the Congress who wear earmuffs made of special interest money. She added that Mikie Sherill is passionate about and dedicated to eliminating unlimited special interest money from American politics. She went on to say that people in the district are looking for someone that can unrig the game plagued with money that comes from big corporations and billionaires interested in the benefits of funding candidates who would later “own them a favor.”

This fight is symbolic because she is running against Rodney Frelinghuysen, a very experienced lawyer, and GOP power player. By all means, Frelinghuysen represents Big Money in politics. Because of this, he has managed to beat every challenger to his congressional seat by outspending them. However, Mikie Sherill found a reliable and equally passionate ally in End Citizen’s United.

Learn more:https://mothershipstrategies.com/case-study/end-citizens-united/

 

End Citizens United Comes to the Aid of the Johnson Amendment

The team at End Citizens United have been working hard over the past two years in order to introduce measures to scale back the impact of the disastrous Supreme Court ruling in 2010, regarding the conservative group Citizens United. End Citizens United is a political action committee led by PAC President Tiffany Muller. After the election of Donald Trump to the White House, Muller and her team realized that they had a tough task ahead of them. Looking past more than just the Citizens United ruling, which opened the floodgates of lobbyists and dark money in Washington, End Citizens United is also taking aim to protect the Johnson Amendment from an unheard of attack launched by America’s right wing.

The Johnson Amendment is a ruling that was established in order to keep religious money out of the world of politics. In doing so, the Johnson Amendment further encouraged and enforced the separation of Church and State. Anybody who has payed attention tot he political scene realizes just how important this amendment is and has been.The Johnson Act was put into law back in 1954 and it was introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson before being signed by Dwight Eisenhower. The effort to make the Johnson Act a law was a bipartisan effort that passed with little controversy. However, as the years have gone by Washington D.C. has ruptured and split into two different political parties with little to no common grown. While Democrats and progressive PACs like End Citizens United have been willing to cross the aisle, there has been little-to-no reach back from the right wing. Learn more on opensecrets.org to know more.

The heart of the Johnson Amendment revolves around prevent religious organizations, primarily churches, from getting involved in politics by way of influencing their congregation. Now, there are a number of reasons that this is a part of our system. The primary reason is that religious establishments do not pay taxes and thus should not be able to abuse their tax-free exemption to try and sway political discourse. Despite the Johnson Act being on the books since 1954, many churches and religious organizations around the country have been trying to flout the legality of the law — thus forcing the IRS to become involved.

Nowadays, people like President Trump are intentionally thumbing their noses at the protected and established laws on the books regarding religious separation from politics. President Trump himself signed an executive order this past May which forced the IRS to stop acting and enforcing the Johnson Amendment. Of course, executive orders do not count as laws and the IRS is under no obligation to listen to the order. However, by signing this EO Trump made it clear to his supporters that he does not respect the Johnson Amendment. Now, groups like End Citizens United are trying to raise awareness and supported for the respected laws on our books. Visit:https://twitter.com/stopbigmoney?lang=en

 

George Soros Criticizes Donald Trump

George Soros is a billionaire hedge fund manager who has used his immense financial success to fight for progressive causes. Soros came to the United States after years as a migrant in Europe. He fled his home of Hungary in 1946 following the end of World War II and the growth of the Soviet Union. His experience living under Nazism and Soviet communism have led Soros towards the causes of justice for the most vulnerable and a free and prosperous society. Soros has regularly supported Democratic nominees and opposed politicians he considers harmful for American society. This is no different following the election of Donald Trump as 45th President of the United States. Read more on Snopes about George Soros.

Soros strongly opposes Trump’s stance on immigration. In an article for Forbes, Antoine Gara outlines some of the finer points of Soros’ criticisms. Soros’ own experiences as an immigrant makes him a logical opponent to politicians that take a hard line against immigration. In Soros’ eyes the attitude of Trump and other politicians creates the circumstances necessary for the growth of groups like ISIS. Soros points to the wars in Syria and Iraq as justification from immigration and, following closed doors he believes that migrants will turn to more extreme actions.

His criticism of American politics extended past policies on immigration. Soros also criticized Janet Yellen, the first woman to chair the Federal Reserve. Soros can be viewed as particularly partisan with his steadfast support of Democrats and constant opposition to Republicans but Yellen was sworn in under President Barack Obama. George Soros claims that Yellen’s policies have been damaging to the market. He opposes her policy of quantitative easing, a policy that Yellen has pursued. Gara suggests that regardless of Soros’ highly politicized nature, his opinions on the economy must be respected given his proven business acumen.

Visit his profile on twitter.com.